Read this article carefully. The headline says…. “Labour may face Blair by-election”. Now read it again. Anyone see anything at all, even the tiniest morsel, which evidences the bold assertion that there is even the slightest prospect of a by-election in Sedgfield?
No… because there is absolutely no evidence at all. Of course, it is not untrue. There may be a blizzard in Dubai later this afternoon too… but how much longer do we have to put up with this sort of lazy-arsed journalism where reporters stuck in an office somewhere in London decide that their job is not to report the news, but to make up the news by writing this sort of nonsense? Iain Dale and other blogging gossip-mongers can get away with this type of crap speculation, but journalists on so-called serious newspapers should not be allowed to.
- For a fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people and their families...
On the Side of the Angels
- A Very Public Sociologist
- A week is a long time in politics
- Andy Howell
- Beau Bo D'Or
- Bench
- Bloggerheads
- Chicken Yoghurt
- Councillor Mike Leddy
- Councillor Tim
- Dave Osler
- Enemies of Reason
- Fat Man in the Bathtub
- Frank Owen's Paintbrush
- Freemania
- From One End of Kent
- Grimmer Up North
- Hagley Road to Ladywood
- Hopi Sen
- Jailhouse Lawyer
- Jon's Union Blog
- Julian's Musings
- Labour List
- Labour News
- Labour of Love
- Labour2
- Left Foot Forward
- Left of the Line
- Liberal Conspiracy
- Liverpool Lefty
- Luke's Blog
- Ministry of Truth
- Never Trust a Hippy
- Next Left
- Obsolete
- Occupied Country
- Our Man in Hanoi
- Paul Linford
- Political Hack
- Putting Members First
- Raincoat Optimism
- Skipper
- Skuds
- Slugger O'Toole
- Stephen Newton's Diary
- The Daily (Maybe)
- The Methodist Preacher
- The Middle of the Line
- The Plastic Hippo
- The YamYam
- Though Cowards Flinch
- Three Score Years & Ten
- Tom Watson MP
The Dark Side
The Media
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
Meta


All I get is Firefox can’t find server, but the url is Indy. Perhaps they pulled it in response to your criticism?
It’s a vicious cycle Bob.
Falling circulation means papers are more and more desperate for a big headline to pull in the casual buyer, rather than the loyal subscriber.
But as you point out the story looks lazy and half-cocked, therefore regular readers are likely to be turned off from it.
And if in order to help a paper out of this decline (the Indy is the poorest selling ‘quality’ paper) someone makes a subscription in the hope that extra funding will mean better investment, then sadly it leaves the powers that be thinking they can get away with publishing this sort of thing and people will still pay for it.
Journalists on the Indy are, I believe, among the worst paid of the former broadsheets.
If you’re stuck in the office you don’t get to go out, meet contacts and get the interesting stories.
Incidentally these comments should not be taken out of context. I’m on about this story in the Indy and make no comparison with my own employers whatsoever.
John… no, just my cock-up in making the link. Thanks for the tip… it’s working now.