Bob Piper has been a Labour Councillor for the Abbey
Ward in Sandwell, West Midlands, for 10 years. He is a lifelong supporter of Aston Villa Football Club and a follower of Yorkshire County Cricket Club.
The views expressed here are mine in a personal capacity, not those of the Labour Party, Sandwell MBC, Aston Villa or Yorkshire County Cricket Club. Get it! Mine... just mine!
Promoted by Bob Piper of 115 Barclay Rd, B67 5JZ on behalf of the Labour Party, care of 39 Victoria Street London, SW1H 0HA . Hosted (printed) by Swaithe Internet Solutions who are not responsible for any of the contents of these posts.
Please note however, that The Labour Party is not responsible for the content of this website or individual posts as, unless specifically stated, I am writing solely in a personal and individual capacity.
Promoted by Bob Piper of 115 Barclay Rd, B67 5JZ on behalf of the Labour Party, care of 39 Victoria Street London, SW1H 0HA . Hosted (printed) by Swaithe Internet Solutions who are not responsible for any of the contents of these posts.
Please note however, that The Labour Party is not responsible for the content of this website or individual posts as, unless specifically stated, I am writing solely in a personal and individual capacity.
The Vietnam War (or the American War as the Vietnamese call it) was the first war to be covered in all of its gore on television and in the media. Few who ever saw it could easily forget the shocking imagery when the South Vietnamese General Nguyen Ngoc Loan executed a Vietcong fighter with a bullet shot to the head. It helped to make the US population aware of the brutality of the war they were waging in Vietnam and shaped the resistance to the war.
By the time the Iraq war came round, lessons had been learned. Journalists and camera crews were 'embedded' and in return for titbits from the Generals, according to one report at the time...
The New York Times correspondents live in Baghdad behind a massive stockade with four watchtowers, protected by locally hired, rifle-toting security men, complete with NYT T-shirts. America's NBC television chain are holed up in a hotel with an iron grille over their door, forbidden by their security advisers to visit the swimming pool or the restaurant "let alone the rest of Baghdad" lest they be attacked. Several Western journalists do not leave their rooms while on station in Baghdad.
If the war was going to be fought out on TV, it was going to be their war which was broadcast.
The Israelis have tried to go one step further by banning the media from entering Gaza. Even the Israeli Government with its almost total disregard for international opinion know the images of fatalities in Gaza will be very powerful, and they have done everything they can to prevent the media getting in, whilst at the same time showing graphic images of the impact of missiles in Southern Israel.
However, technology moves on. The power of internet and e-mail means that people can get a worldwide distribution of their images out into the world within minutes of an explosion. The various Iraqi bloggers were able to paint graphic pictures of life inside a war zone, and the same thing is happening in Gaza. The revolution may not be televised, but the internet war is the future.
You're right about that shocking imagery. You do, however, perpetuate a myth when you describe the man shot as being Viet Cong. Even the BBC get it slightly wrong. He was a senior officer in the North Vietnamese Army, caught spying in civilian clothes behind South Vietnamese lines. Summary execution would be the norm for any such individual in any war, on any side. Not nice, but true.
Fergus, I'm not sure where you have your information about the guy being shot, because the last I read there was some doubt about who he was, never mind what he was. Also, the line between the Vietgong and the North Vietnamese Army regulars was never terribly clear.
So, I won't say you are wrong... but you ain't having a good day here.
Of course he was shot - after all - you say he was (lines 3 and 4 of your blog post), with the General's pistol, else why would it all have been so shocking? The whole point was that it appeared to be the cold-blooded murder of a civilian, even though it wasn't.
January 7, 2009 4:37 PM | permalink
You're right about that shocking imagery. You do, however, perpetuate a myth when you describe the man shot as being Viet Cong. Even the BBC get it slightly wrong. He was a senior officer in the North Vietnamese Army, caught spying in civilian clothes behind South Vietnamese lines. Summary execution would be the norm for any such individual in any war, on any side. Not nice, but true.