Bob Piper
Bob Piper










Designed by Wibbler
Produced by Wibbler
Hosted by BatchTarget



Button it!   » Permalink  |  TrackBack (0)

I've just watched a piece on Sky News in which they state, with some sense of surprise, that although the NHS is supposed to be 'national' there is still a 'postcode lottery' with different levels of funding available for treatment, depending on which part of the country you live in.

Well, given that there will inevitably be some 'rationing' of health care unless any government is going to offer unlimited funds to the NHS, just exactly how do our friends at the Murdoch Corporation think health priorities? Should it be by Alan Johnson and his civil servants sitting down and divvying up the 'national' pot based on what they think the priorities should be for every region of the country? Or should Regions be allocated funding and they decide on the basis of local, evidence-based information.

Because, either way, you're going to have a postcode lottery element. Sadly, the problem is in the rationing effect... someone loses out, and they ain't going to like it.

Now if Murdoch and his moguls want to start campaigning for scrapping Trident, increasing taxation, and un-rationed, unlimited finance for health care, I'll be right there with you lads.

But if all you want to do is sensationalise, take advantage of people's misery, and whinge... might I respectfully suggest you button it!

Posted by bobpiper on September 7, 2008, 12:41 PM  |  view comments (6) or add another



Trackbacks
TrackBack Link: http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2391


Comments (or post a new one)

fred said:
September 7, 2008 2:07 PM | permalink

Let Tescos run the NHS.

Their stores are all the same the length and breadth of the country.
Waiting times are minimal.
The stores are clean.
Parking is free.
A tin of Beans is the same price for rich or poor.
Their toilets are clean and well stocked with handcleanser.
Their canteens are cheap and the food is good.
Good securiy ensures no fighting on a Saturday night and drunks are not welcome.
The managers are well trained and efficient.
Customer service is pro-active.
Their customer wheelchairs are well serviced.
And they give clubpoints




Hughes Views said:
September 7, 2008 2:14 PM | permalink

One of the ways I've found to amuse myself in my declining years is by baiting the enthusiastic young Tory MP for the Forest of Dean. He is a simple soul and very keen on the reduction of meddling by Whitehall bureaucrats and suchlike.

But now he's horrified (allegedly) to discover that his constituents who get their health services in Wales get a different set of services to those who get them in England.

So, I'm led to ask, does he wants a highly centralised, not to say Stalinist, NHS? No satisfactory reply so far...




wonkotsane said:
September 8, 2008 6:40 AM | permalink

If we had an English government looking after English interests we might be able to get free hospital parking, free prescriptions and the same treatments for alzheimers and cancer that they do in Scotland. As it is nobody represents England's interests because we are the only nation in Europe with no direct political representation. The Barnett Formula pillages billions from the English taxpayer in the form of the celtgeld which the devolved administrations then lavish on their ungrateful subjects. The British MPs elected in England won't speak up for England because that's not good for Britain whilst the celts get to elect their own set of politicians who are interested only in what is best for them and stuff England.

The only way to stop apartheid in England is to create an English Parliament. The British nationalist Liebour government gave the celts a referendum, why should we be denied one?




Letters From A Tory said:
September 8, 2008 9:48 AM | permalink

Postcode lotteries are the natural consequence of different healthcare needs in different parts of the country. They will always exist and I ignore every headline that mentions them.




Ernesto said:
September 8, 2008 12:13 PM | permalink

Hope there's no rationing of Sagres and Vinho Verde.....




newmania said:
September 8, 2008 1:37 PM | permalink


The reason people have absurd expectations is that government spending has increase over 80% under Labour ( 55% adjusted) ocvverall. In health proportionately more. About £269 billion pa ( part of the trillion or so increase). For that money we get.. ok
My wife waited two years for a hip operation, but they did a good job. Our care for the twins was ok when they finally got their dates right but it was very far from perfect and at times frighteningly disorganised.
This remember is pretty much the only conspicuous thing we get for our taxes
Thing is Bob, it was 'ok' and no better in 1997. Where did the £270 billion go ? This, remember is during a period when every other walk of life is delivering the same a better products with 20% of the people.
It is not true to say that the post code lottery is meaningless . What it means is that even with the prodigious expense of management ( which I do not call a bad thing per se) there is a still a woeful allocation of resources and quite clearly a misues of excess capacity. Freedom to make clinical decisions is one thing this is evidence of a floundering system and they look because they know what they will find
The only cure for this is to return the NHS to be a basic provider from which we do not expect high standards and have top up payments and a customer basis . It has to happen in some sense answers for the 1940s simply do not fit the next Millenium.





Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)