Bob Piper
Bob Piper










Designed by Wibbler
Produced by Wibbler
Hosted by BatchTarget



Is Cameron turning back?   » Permalink  |  TrackBack (0)

DAVID-CAMERON.jpgBill Jones, commenting on John Kampfner's piece on CiF, asks whether David Cameron has abandoned his 'cuddly Dave' image and we are now going to see a return to hard-nosed Toryism.

Personally, I think both Kamfner and Bill are wrong. Although Cameron has a reputation for being a right-winger who wrote Howard's speeches and carried Lamont's bags for him, I actually think he believes all of this enviromental, human-face-of-the-conservatives stuff. One of the mistakes the Tories made about Tony Blair was portraying him as a CND-supporting left-wing socialist with demon eyes behind the flashing smile and centre-right rhetoric. When they found out Blair was genuine (about this, at least) it was too late to change tack and they found themselves beached.

As I say, I believe Cameron believes. I do think he is a very comfortably off, upper middle class chap with a nice family and a concern for the future of his children and the planet. How all that will play out with his Party, when actually they, like many in the Labour leadership, are more interested in growth and productivity than they are in the environment and regulation, is a tightrope Cameron will have to walk if he is ever elected.

So I think it is wrong to portray Cameron in this role of hypocrite. But whether he can convince the rest of his Party that they are no longer the nasty party and they should get in tune with their feminine side, is another matter altogether.

However, as we found out with Blair, someone who delivers you a victory after over a decade in the wilderness, no matter how weak the opposition, brings with them one hell of a lot of credibility and good will. In those circumstances, those who think he is just nuts, would not find it easy to turn the ship around.

Posted by bobpiper on August 12, 2008, 10:54 AM  |  view comments (12) or add another



Trackbacks
TrackBack Link: http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2332


Comments (or post a new one)

Neil Harding said:
August 12, 2008 11:33 AM | permalink

Cameron has engaged in some very clever PR stunts to give the impression of 'niceness' and you have swallowed it hook, line and sinker, but where are his actual policies on green issues or social justice?

The Tories just seem to be offering the same Thatcherite solutions they did in the 80s - build more roads and out of town shops, say cutting price of petrol is more important (although they won't do anything about it), and propose cutting public services and magically relying on an inadequate charitable third sector to take its place. Same old Tories, Cameron's cuddly image is just that - image.

Saying all that, if people do actually believe his crafted image, it might be difficult for us to score points - so in one way maybe you are right - maybe we should say Cameron is everything he says he is and then lose the election that way instead of losing it the other way.




Bob Piper said:
August 12, 2008 1:10 PM | permalink

Neil, Blair was policy-lite supreme before Labour won in '97.




newmania said:
August 12, 2008 2:00 PM | permalink

Thats a tremdndously insightful post.Cameron will not have a lot of trouble with the Party which is far more Conservative and less Neo Liberal than would appear from the blogasphere. Margaret Thatcher was , of course much loved , but that was in the context of the perceived need to defend the country from the Unions and forced of the hard left in the 70s. She was actually on the left in her early career. She really only became the spitting image puppet as time went on
In more consensual times conservatism re-asserts itself and Cameron is so obviously a conservative that he almost defines it evolves ( which it always does ).
The problem will not come from the "right " of the Party who are weak but from the state of the country?s finances and the economy , this may produce more pressure for tax cuts than he can withstand , I hope not . Cameron has had little credit for preparing the way for tax rises and negotiating a compromise on Europe but both have been achieved .It is commonly said that there is no enthusiasm for a Conservative government but I am not convinced .I am also not convinced that the economy is so bad that Labour's current travails can be blamed entirely on it. Cameron IMHO has been underestimated from the just as Brown was overestimated .

Having said that Brown is being absurdly harshly judged just as Major was . I agree with the main thrust of this post and I have also recognised many of the errors I remember all too well in the reactions of the Labour Party. If I was concerned about the long term future of Labour I would say this . Trying, now, to avoid an electoral judgement by a sleight of hand /change at the top must be tempting but it would be a mistake . In the fullness of time Brown will still be remembered with more affection than Blair and rebirth comes from developing resources in the Party not transplanting American ideas where they will not put down roots . Labour must go to the Polls with its record good and bad and be seen as an honest dealer with the people . From there it has to realign itself with ordinary working people who perceive it as only interested in 'Causes'. Stop running a 24 hour press campaign and inventing silly laws on the hoof driven by focus groups , the media and the Conservative Party.
This is not so impossible and if trust could be re-established I think at the very least the next election need not be a catastrophe. In all honesty I cannot see any way to win from this point but it appears to me that the very worst people have their hands on the tiller.
My further disinterested advice would be this. Just as the Conservatives had to stop being obsessed with the past Labour has to stop being obsessed with the imagined future and this means not continually telling everyone that everything they value wish for and fear is wrong.





Mickey cool said:
August 12, 2008 3:10 PM | permalink

This picture of him terrifies me is he the new blowfelt. What evil plans is he thinking up. Blowflet had a white cat he has a puppy.




Paul Sandars said:
August 12, 2008 4:39 PM | permalink

I think Blofeld had a white cat as well....;))

Which leads me nicely on to tell the tale of Ian Fleming. He was horribly bullied at Eton...by the later architect Erno Goldfinger, the father of Henry Blofeld and a chap called Scaramanga....

Revenge is a dish better served cold......




Bob Piper said:
August 12, 2008 5:31 PM | permalink

So... there is an Eton connection then. I wonder if young Davy was bullied too.




Mickey cool said:
August 12, 2008 5:36 PM | permalink

Paul Sandars How do you know this Were you Goldfinger




Mickey cool said:
August 12, 2008 5:37 PM | permalink

Paul Sandars Or are you scaramanga. How is your 3rd nipple?




Paul Sandars said:
August 12, 2008 11:11 PM | permalink

Hoping your SAT results were good, and what you wanted for next year's banding, Mickey.




Letters From A Tory said:
August 13, 2008 10:02 AM | permalink

Cameron doesn't have to convince the party that he is right about everything - he just has to get them to shut up long enough to win the next general election!




Mickey Cool said:
August 13, 2008 11:09 AM | permalink

Why do you think I am doing sats? Do you normally only talk to under 16 year old on the internet.




Paul Sandars said:
August 13, 2008 3:23 PM | permalink

Mickey, do you write reports for Policy Exchange by any chance?





Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)