"thinly veiled attack on lesbian parents"

I just call it 'supporting the family'.

1What is wrong with David Mellor supporting Chelsea? Not sure I follow you there.

2-It has nothing to do with attacking lesbians its to do with concerns about conducting an experiment in Lesbian living and its effects on children. Personally I have been convinced that on balance that the advantages out weight the disadvantages but the arrogance of many of the pro Lesbian anti man lobby is a great temptation to dig your heels in.

3 I am happy with the hybrid embryos .

4 What I am disappointed about is the fact that at 24 weeks a girls can pull out a fully formed baby capable of living and chop it up because it does not suit her life style at that particular time . We are way way out of line here and Parliament specifically the Labour dominated Parliament is out of touch with feelings on this. I hoped that 20 weeks would be agreed .

The problem is that the entirely spurious debate about viability allows femi-nazis to clog up the air time with stats collected from their supporters in white coats . I am well aware how defenceless a new born baby is requiring 24 hours a day of attention to stay alive so I do not see the relevance .

You cannot go on sneering at people who have very reasonable worries and Parliament , in my view served us very badly on this issue . It will return and it will be won eventually.

How do you fancy killing a 24 week baby? I couldn?t and the majority of Doctors agree

I couldn't see anything wrong with the existing legislation as it stood. Don’t the government have more pressing matters to attend to in the middle of a credit crunch?

Oh yes, must remember how awful the Tories are! That will help.

You have done better Bob.

newmania, I can only assume you posted those comments here by mistake. I don't recall posting anything one way or the other about abortion time limits, although the faux outrage and moral hysteria of the right surprises me not one jot. Where did you canvass the opinion of 'most' doctors, by the way, as the BMA hasn't debated abortion, but its general stance in all but the most extreme cases is to support 24 weeks. What was your methodology?

Wolfie... I'm unclear what your point actually is. The anti-abortionists placed amendments to the Bill on Fertilisation and Human Embryos. Are you suggesting that Parliament should have refused to debate them on the grounds that you were happy with the current limits and in any case, there's a credit crunch?

Wierd. I'm sure you've commented better in the past Wolfie.

David Mellor......the classic example of extending the abortion time limit to, say, 59 years?

if you need anything to put a bit of justified fire back into your belly just check out some of the comments in Iain Dale's report on the vote last night,and then Mad Nad's attack on Labour and Gordon Brown over the issue this morning.

1What is wrong with David Mellor supporting Chelsea? Not sure I follow you there.

I object to that fat oaf pretending to be a football fan, let alone a Chelsea fan.He murdered the 606 football phone in for a couple of years when he was host, he knew sod all about football.

I've already suggested 40 years to take in Praguetory, much to BULS' amusement.

What's wrong with Mellor supporting Chelsea?

1) He had previously said that he supported Fulham and clearly deserted them to chase glory.

2) The first time that his support became public knowledge was when it came out that he wore a replica shirt while having sex with some young lady. I can't see how the mental picture is anything but horrific to any rational mind.