Bob Piper
Bob Piper










Designed by Wibbler
Produced by Wibbler
Hosted by BatchTarget



Hugo and Ken   » Permalink  |  TrackBack (0)

Tom Miller with a pretty good defence of Livingstone's links with Hugo Chavez including a description of Chavez's revolution as an 'irreversible shift in the balance of power towards working people and their families' which you will find in the sidebar to this blog. All those Labour people who decry both Ken and Chavez might recognise the phrase... it was in the Labour Party's Manifesto in 1974 -an election we won! Never mind the bloody Euro referendum, that's the broken manifesto promise I'm still waiting for.

Posted by bobpiper on January 22, 2008, 10:45 PM  |  view comments (5) or add another



Trackbacks
TrackBack Link: http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1861


Comments (or post a new one)

GW said:
January 22, 2008 11:38 PM | permalink

Top marks for recognising the Quote.

Bottom Marx for forgetting that Chaves's conversion to "peoples democracy" is extereamly recent. and a cast on his previous attitude in supprot of Military takeovers etc




newmania said:
January 23, 2008 12:13 AM | permalink

Well you could live in the paradise that is Venezuela I suppose.No doubt you find Livingstones approval of Islamic Nazis and the IRA equally edifying .
Lovely , and as I am a working man can I politely request you not to help me any more , thus far you have helped me into near penury with a 30% adjusted spending increase in ten years paid for by the single income family.Help someone else please.
I didn`t know Compass had roots in some Communist sect , they are Ken`s favourite think tank and have been working for nothing it appears on his behalf , you recall all the fuss.
Interesting, I didn`t know you were a far left radical Bob , were you a member of some organisation called Real Communist Future or something (splitters)? I daresay you had a pony tail and everything




Bob Gom said:
January 23, 2008 1:18 AM | permalink

Reading Nick Cohen on Ken, it seems the substance of his allegations were that Livingstone had some friends in the WRP and some of his advisers belonged to an obscure socialist sect. There seemed to be no specific allegations of wrong doing with regards to them, purely guilt by association.




Bob Piper said:
January 23, 2008 10:00 AM | permalink

GW - it depends what you mean by extremely recent. As I understand it Chavez has held these views for some considerable time, but in any event, what does that matter? I am all for people learning as they get older. Take newmania, for instance. Until I recently began chastising him his grammar, punctuation and spelling were simply shocking. Now, after only a couple of months he is almost able to compose a coherent sentence or two. OK, it is the same old rambling twaddle, and he will have to work much harder on his comprehension and structure, and his arguments are as batty as ever they were, but where there is light, there is hope.

Anyway, much better that Hugo has got wiser with age. Far better, in my opinion, that people turn from authoritarianism to people's democracy as they get older. Sadly with many it is the other way round.




Matthew Stiles said:
January 23, 2008 12:07 PM | permalink

The 1992 rebellion by Chavez needs a bit of context. It was hard on the heels of the "caracazo" which saw hundreds of deaths at the very least. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caracazo

Venezuela a paradise? It is a beautiful country that's for sure, from the beaches of Margarita to the mountains of Tachira, I would well recommend a visit. I second Tom Miller's description of Chavez's government.

The Channel 4 programme was a disgrace I thought and particularly disappointing coming from the political editor of the New Statesman. They've lost my sub for sure.





Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)