Bob Piper
Bob Piper










Designed by Wibbler
Produced by Wibbler
Hosted by BatchTarget



He's flipping... he's flopping.   » Permalink  |  TrackBack (0)

Of course, we wouldn't want to accuse David Cameron of dithering now, would we folks. As I caught the train to London this morning, as the brown stuff was really hitting the media, Cameron was Dale-like in his resolve to support his man Conway. By the time I boarded the train back this afternoon he had flopped back again and he's distancing himself from Dekka at a rate of knots. At least, man, if you're going to dither, have the bloody decency to draw breath before you change your mind.

Posted by bobpiper on January 29, 2008, 6:50 PM  |  view comments (11) or add another



Trackbacks
TrackBack Link: http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1885


Comments (or post a new one)

Byeck said:
January 30, 2008 10:49 AM | permalink

One quite big difference 'twixt Tory and Labour reactions to sleaze - Conway has lost the Whip while all the Labour suspects have been allowed to keep it.




Bob Piper said:
January 30, 2008 11:13 AM | permalink

Could I suggest one other (rather bigger) difference. Conway has been found guilty of 'misusing' or 'diverting' tens of thousands of pounds of public money into the pockets of his own family.

Try doing that at work and see if you get away with a 10-day suspension and the whip and a tap on the wrist from the boss.

If you could point me in the direction of the Labour MPs doing that, I would quite happily call for a far more severe penalty.




Stephen Newton said:
January 30, 2008 11:28 AM | permalink

The Daily Mail's really got the bit between its teeth on this one and Conway is something of a no-mark.




Curly said:
January 30, 2008 11:36 AM | permalink

Conway is guilty of being disreputable and misusing public funds, but has he broken any law of the land?




Bob Piper said:
January 30, 2008 1:01 PM | permalink

I suppose that would depend on a jury if you want the technical answer Curly.

For the non-technical amongst us, trousering tens of thousands of public money could quite possibly be deemed to be a criminal offence.




Methodist Preacher said:
January 30, 2008 1:34 PM | permalink

Some of us in the West Midlands know Conway of old - don't waste your time trying to excuse him!




Byeck said:
January 30, 2008 3:32 PM | permalink

Bob, Bob, Bob,
Abuse of office, false mortgage declarations, use of public funds to transport the mistress hither and you, Blair, Blunkett, Mandelson, Jowell, Robinson, Byers and doubtless more who I can't remember....need I go on?




Bob Piper said:
January 30, 2008 3:45 PM | permalink

Yes, sadly, you'll have to go on, and on, because none of those are comparable. You have listed names... not offences.




Byeck said:
January 30, 2008 8:07 PM | permalink

Not much gets past you, Bob. You are of course quite right - none of my examples can be compared to Conway.

Although you dont say so, I guess you mean that those I quoted were all Cabinet Ministers (and one Prime Minister) They all either lied, broke the law, had slightly dubious financial arrangements or abused their office. Despite this, they all retained the whip and some of them made come-backs.

Conway, on the other hand has lost the whip and been forced to resign (Justifiably) Career over!!

So there you have it, one rule for the Labour front bench and another for a Tory backbencher.

Vive le differnce.




Bob Piper said:
January 30, 2008 8:55 PM | permalink

Just another list. Name these law breakers.




Byeck said:
January 31, 2008 1:38 PM | permalink

Bob, you wee rascal - you're teasing me aren't you?

I do not believe that your fine mind is incapable of fitting the names to the offences.

And now to add to the list, we have the noble Lord Hoyle taking cash for access.

To bring closure, I don't agree with your stance that law breaking is a matter of degree and I would support ANY Leader who acted to clean out the Westminster stable.





Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)