Bob Piper
Bob Piper










Designed by Wibbler
Produced by Wibbler
Hosted by BatchTarget



Are they by any chance related?   » Permalink  |  TrackBack (0)

Judge John Rogers was not in any way Party political point scoring when he lit the blue touch paper made his statement... "As of yesterday I have to bear in mind a communication from the home secretary," before giving a non-custodial sentence to someone who would probably have been given a non-custodial sentence anyway. Of course he wasn't? But are Judge John Rogers and the Conservative Party in any way related... Tom Watson thinks we should be told.

Posted by bobpiper on January 26, 2007, 6:00 PM  |  view comments (3) or add another



Trackbacks
TrackBack Link: http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1078


Comments (or post a new one)

jailhouselawyer said:
January 26, 2007 9:02 PM | permalink

I thought judges were independent. As I recall, Pete Townsend who you may ask, yes that one, did not receive a custodial sentence for his research into downloading child pornography.

John Reid has made a lot of mistakes and a lot of enemies. When it suited him he would grab the headlines to attack others. Now those headlines are attacking him.

I don't like any Home Secretary. But, at least Churchill did reduce the prison population by half. All this get tough on criminals and prisoners, overfilling prisons like rush hour tube trains.

Geoff Hoon on Question Time yesterday tried telling the public that this get tough approach was what they wanted. Not one clap, not one cheer of support, if this government does not get that message then they are not listening and deserve all they get. What they want is an effective system and John Reid is not delivering it.




Bob Piper said:
January 26, 2007 9:17 PM | permalink

Is that the Liberal Churchill who set troops on to the Welsh miners... or the Tory Churchill who authorised the use of WMD (i.e. mustard gas) against the Kurds?

As I say... you pays your money and takes your choice.




jailhouselawyer said:
January 27, 2007 1:17 PM | permalink

I don't give Churchill credit for anything other than reducing the prison population, and his speech in 1910 in which he said: "The mood and temper of the public in regard to the treatment of crime and criminals is one of the most unfailing tests of the civilization of any country". Even if he did somewhat plagarise Dostoievsky.





Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)